Samsung Z Fold 2
Foldable Phones

Z Fold 2

Samsung

Released Sep 1, 2020 · Analysis updated Sep 30, 2026

Experience fluid visuals on a 120Hz display, enjoy extended use with long battery life, and appreciate premium performance in a refined foldable design. The Samsung Z Fold 2 scores 82/100 based on 4 expert reviews in the foldable phones category. Coverage includes reviews from Stuff, Ubergizmo, Android Authority, and Dxomark.

Critic Score

What's this?
82

based on 4 expert reviews

StuffUbergizmoAndroid AuthorityDxomark

Low confidence · only 4 reviews

Critics are split: published scores run from 71 (Dxomark) to 95 (Stuff) — a 24-point spread. Stuff tends to score generously across our dataset.

Average of 4 publication reviews, each normalized to a 0–100 scale. How we score

Where to buy

Help keep the site running by buying via partners.

Pros

  • 120Hz main display(3)
  • Long battery life(2)
  • Premium build quality(2)
  • Powerful performance(2)
  • Improved cover display(2)

Cons

  • High price(3)
  • App scaling issues(3)

4 Publication Reviews

95
Established publication10/2020

AI summary of this review

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G is praised as the first truly great foldable phone, offering a refined design and powerful performance that justifies its premium nature despite a high cost.

Publisher score: 5 of 5

89
Independent publication09/2020

AI summary of this review

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a high-performance, technologically advanced foldable phone that offers a premium visual experience despite its high cost and some app optimization issues.

Publisher score: 8.9/10

74
Established publication09/2022

AI summary of this review

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a powerful and refined foldable that successfully blends a phone and tablet, though its massive price tag and bulk make it a luxury niche product.

Score estimated from the review text

71
Independent publication12/2020

AI summary of this review

While the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 offers great color and exposure, it is hindered by poor texture detail, autofocus struggles in low light, and various image artifacts.

Publisher score: 109